Research Report·May 2026·33 pages

Announced Increases in Carbon Pricing and Their Implications for Corporate Valuations

Unpriced carbon costs may represent a material risk to corporate earnings and valuations. Global corporate emissions place more than 20% of profit at risk.

$14.5T
Estimated annual societal cost across Scope 1, 2 & 3 emissions
HomeResearchResearch Report

EcoMap's bottom-up analysis of approximately 20k companies globally identifies critical financial risks for investors and companies. The cost of emissions is no longer only an external societal challenge, but also a direct risk of material liability on corporate income statements and cashflows. Carbon pricing mechanisms and regulations are increasingly internalising the costs of corporate emissions, shifting them from society to the companies that generate them.

Research Report
33 pages — free to read, with full charts, methodology, and citations.
Download PDF →

By the numbers

22.2%
of EBITDA at risk from Scope 1 emissions alone, for profitable companies
26.9%
projected enterprise-value reduction in aviation if Scope 1 is fully priced in
29.3%
projected enterprise-value reduction in maritime transport
+104%
Norway's carbon tax increase from 2024 to 2030 ($118 → $241 / tCO₂e)
14 bps
higher borrowing cost paid by high-emission firms vs. low-emission peers
−5.3%
global decoupling rate (2020–2023): environmental costs grew faster than revenue

Three critical risks for corporates and investors

01

Reduced profitability and earnings volatility

Unanticipated increases in carbon costs have the potential to materially reduce operating margins and cash flows — potentially erasing more than 20% of profit if regulatory changes are not anticipated for high-emitting industries. Aviation faces ~20% of revenue exposure by 2030; maritime transport doubles from 9.4% to over 19% of revenue.

02

Elevated cost of capital and valuation risk

High-emission companies are already paying a "carbon premium" on debt — 14 basis points higher borrowing costs on average. As markets reprice transition risk into valuation models, fully internalising Scope 1 emissions could reduce enterprise values by 26.9% in aviation and 29.3% in maritime transport.

03

Global transition risk has increased since 2020

Between 2020 and 2023, global environmental costs grew faster than revenue, producing a negative decoupling rate of −5.3%. Construction (−12.94%), technology and communications (−8.27%), and retail and auto services (−7.37%) all show significant deterioration in environmental efficiency per unit of revenue.

What's inside

  1. 1Introduction
  2. 2Methodology: From emissions to financial cost
  3. 3Carbon tax alignment and regulatory risk for leading nations
  4. 4Carbon liability as a core transition risk
  5. 5Strategic implications for business and investment
  6. 6About EcoMap: Democratizing climate data and analysis
Read the full report

Download the full research report

33 pages — free to read, with full charts, methodology, and citations.

Download PDF →
EcoMap
BETA

Translating environmental impact into financial metrics for companies, industries, and countries to drive sustainable decision-making and investment.

Connect with us

LinkedIn

Platform

  • Macro Analysis
  • Explore Data

Resources

  • Why Monetize?
  • How it Works
  • Use Cases
  • Insights
  • Research

Company

  • About Us
  • Partners
  • Contact

Legal

  • Legal
NHH logo
MSCI Institute logo

© 2026 EcoMap. All rights reserved.
Developed in partnership with MSCI Institute, The International Foundation for Valuing Impacts (IFVI) and Norwegian School of Economics.